Maryland Legislative Agenda for Women

 

Home Page

About Us

2012 Briefing & Reception

2011 Legislative Agenda

2010 Legislative Wrap Up

2009 Legislative Wrap Up

What You Can Do to Support Us

What You Can Do to Take Action on Legislation

Calendar of Events

Join!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Criminal Law - Third Degree Sexual Offense - Person in Position of Authority 

Bill Number:            HB1090 and SB681 

Synopsis               A bill to prohibit persons in authority from sexually exploiting the adolescents and children they work with at all times, including when the child is not technically in their care.  

Committee(s): House Judiciary and Senate Judicial Proceedings

Lead Sponsors: Delegate Cheryl Glenn, 410-841-3257, Delegate Kris Valderrama, 301-858-3210, Senator C. Anthony Muse, 301-858-3092 

Lead Group(s): Maryland Coalition Against Sexual Assault, Lisae C. Jordan, Legislative Council, 443-995-5544 

Background Information: 

Child sexual abuse is an issue of great concern for women.  One in four girls will be sexually abused.  Finkelhor, David, et al. "Sexual Abuse in a National Survey of Adult Men and Women: Prevalence, Characteristics, and Risk Factors." 1990.  Women with a childhood history of sexual abuse are 4.7 times more likely to be subsequently raped.  Merrill, L.L., et al. "Childhood Abuse and Sexual Revictimization in a Female Navy Recruit Sample." Naval Health Research Center, 1997.  The issue of child sexual abuse has only recently begun to attract the attention of policymakers and much work remains to be done. 

This bill would close a loophole in Maryland’s child sexual abuse law.  Current laws against sexual abuse of a minor fail to encompass sexual conduct that occurs when the adult does not have “temporary care or custody or responsibility for supervision of a minor”.  See Criminal Law Article §3-602.  Past cases have provided examples of adults avoiding criminal liability for sexual misconduct with the minor teenagers they have power and influence over.  For instance, a martial arts teacher may not have sexual relations with his student while the student is under his supervision.  He may, however, avoid the charge of sexual abuse of a minor by persuading the student to have sexual relations at other times and in other places.  The coercive nature of the relationship and power imbalance between teacher and student does not change with the new time and location.  Shockingly, the student’s protection under Maryland’s law does.     

2006 amendments to the sex crimes law addressed a small number of cases of sexual exploitation between some educators and students.  The 2006 changes made it a misdemeanor sex offense in the 4th degree for a “full-time permanent employee” of a “public or private preschool, elementary school, or secondary school” including a “principal, vice principal, teacher or school counselor” to have sex with one of their students.  This fails to prohibit sexual conduct between teenage students and part-time teachers, temporary teachers, volunteers or others in our children’s educational institutions.  It also fails to cover those who teach children in extra-curricular activities such as sports, arts, tutoring, or religious activities.   

The Person in Authority bill would close the gaps in the current law.  This bill has failed in the House Judiciary Committee by one vote in the last two sessions.  The sponsors anticipate making some changes to the bill language prior to reintroduction to address concerns raised about sexual conduct between people very close in age.  The bill was not voted on in the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee.

 

 

 

Send mail to admin@mdlegagenda4women.org with questions or comments about this web site.
Last modified: January 16, 2012